Verdict. MyFundedFutures has the strongest published payout record in the futures prop sector — $123m across 55,733 payouts, $74m of it in a single 90-day window — and it removed the daily loss limit from every plan, which is a genuine structural concession to traders. The caveat is on the other side of the payout: a recurring complaint pattern in which accounts are terminated shortly after a withdrawal request, on compliance grounds the firm does not evidence publicly. Good odds of being paid; poorly documented odds of being cut off.
Key terms at a glance
- Account sizes: $25,000 to $150,000 across five plans — Core, Rapid, Pro, Flex and Builder (MyFundedFutures rules guide, 2026)
- Evaluation fee: from $77/month; single-phase evaluation
- Activation fee: $0 firm-wide, on every plan and every account size
- Profit target: approximately 6% — $1,500 on $25k, $3,000 on $50k, $6,000 on $100k, $9,000 on $150k
- Daily loss limit: none on any of the five current plans
- Drawdown: 3% end-of-day trailing (Core, Pro), 4% intraday trailing (Rapid), 4% end-of-day fixed (Flex), checkout-set max loss of $1,500 or $2,000 (Builder)
- Profit split: 80/20 on Core and Pro, 90/10 on Rapid
- Minimum trading days: two
The daily loss limit is gone, and that matters more than the split
Most futures prop firms run two loss constraints in parallel: an overall drawdown and a daily loss limit. The daily limit is what ends most evaluations, because it converts a single bad session into a terminal event regardless of how the account is performing overall. MyFundedFutures has removed it from all five current plans. A trader can have a genuinely poor day and continue, provided the overall drawdown line holds.
That is a more valuable concession than a headline profit split, and it is worth being precise about why. A 90/10 split versus 80/20 changes the payout on $5,000 of profit by $500. Surviving a bad session changes whether that $5,000 is earned at all. Traders comparing firms on split alone are optimising the smaller variable.
The drawdown structure is where the plans actually diverge, and the labels are easy to misread. Core and Pro run a 3% end-of-day trail — tighter in percentage terms but advancing only on closing balance. Rapid runs 4% intraday, which is looser in headline percentage and materially harsher in practice, because the line ratchets on unrealised highs. Flex runs a 4% end-of-day fixed drawdown that does not trail at all. Rapid also carries the best split at 90/10, which means the firm’s most generous split sits on its least forgiving drawdown. That pairing is not accidental.
Payouts: what is published, what is reported, what is unverified
What the firm publishes. A cumulative $123m paid across 55,733 payouts, with $74m in the trailing 90 days, processed through Riseworks — a third-party payments platform used across the sector rather than an in-house treasury. Payout cadence runs every five winning days on Core and Rapid, and every 14 calendar days on Pro. The first payout is available 24 hours after the first trade, with subsequent payouts issued daily. On its face this is the most aggressive payout schedule of any firm we have reviewed.
What independent aggregation shows. Trustpilot carries a 4.9/5 rating from 17,498 reviews (Trustpilot), a volume that is difficult to manufacture at that scale even allowing for post-payout review solicitation. Positive reviews cluster consistently around payouts arriving on schedule and support response times. Payout-proof compilations corroborate the pattern (MyFundedFutures payout proof).
What could not be verified. Several things, and they matter. The $123m figure is self-reported and not independently audited — no prop firm in this sector publishes audited payout data, and MyFundedFutures is no exception. Rating figures conflict across sources: 4.9/5 from 17,498 reviews on one reading, 4.7/5 across several hundred reviews on another (PropScorer). Incorporation details conflict too — sources variously place founding in June 2023 and November 2023, and the registered entity in Dallas, Texas and in Dover, Delaware. None of these is disqualifying on its own; collectively they indicate a firm whose public record is assembled from marketing material rather than filings.
We also could not source a verifiable, named, first-hand payout account to quote directly. Reddit’s API blocks automated retrieval, and the complaint reports that do circulate are relayed through review aggregators rather than attributable to a named trader with a public post. We are not going to reproduce an unattributable quote. Readers should weight the following section accordingly: it describes a reported pattern, not a documented one.
The termination complaints
The recurring adverse pattern reported across review platforms is not about payout speed. It is about what happens after the request. Traders describe accounts terminated shortly after a first withdrawal request, on grounds of “multiple profiles” or “coordinated trading”, following a compliance call, with the firm declining to share the specific evidence relied on. One relayed account describes a trader’s spouse being denied a payout on the basis that her husband also traded with the firm (TheTrustedProp). Separate reports describe platform faults — trades executing while the platform was closed, stop losses rejected — with accounts not restored even where an audit trail indicated a server-side error.
Two things can be true at once here, and probably are. A firm paying $74m in 90 days is a firm that pays. A firm growing that fast is also a firm with a strong commercial incentive to police account-sharing and copy-trading rings aggressively, and aggressive policing produces false positives. The absence of a published evidentiary standard for termination is the real finding — not the individual complaints, which are unverifiable, but the fact that a trader has no way to know in advance what would trigger one.
How MyFundedFutures compares
| MyFundedFutures | Apex Trader Funding | Alpha Futures | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily loss limit | None on any plan | None | None published |
| Drawdown | 3% EOD trail / 4% intraday / 4% EOD fixed by plan | Intraday or EOD trail, priced separately | End-of-day trailing, all plans |
| Activation fee | $0 firm-wide | $79–$99 | $149 (Standard/Advanced), $0 Zero |
| Entry cost | From $77/month | ~$210–$296 total to funded | $79–$419/month |
| Profit split | 80/20 Core & Pro, 90/10 Rapid | 100% to $25k, then 90/10 | 70→80→90% Standard; 90% flat elsewhere |
| Minimum days | 2 | 8 trading days | 5 winning days of $200+ |
| Payout cadence | Every 5 winning days (Core/Rapid); 14 days (Pro) | Same or next business day after minimum | Same-day (Zero/Advanced, firm-stated) |
| Consistency rule | 50% evaluation; 40% Core funded; none Rapid/Pro | 30% for payouts | 50/40/20% by tier; none Advanced |
The two-day minimum is the shortest in this group by a wide margin — Apex requires eight trading days, Alpha Futures five winning days of $200 or more. Combined with a $0 activation fee and no daily loss limit, MyFundedFutures is the cheapest and fastest route from evaluation to a first payout among the firms we have reviewed. Against Apex Trader Funding, it is meaningfully cheaper to reach funding; against Take Profit Trader, the payout cadence is comparable but the entry cost is lower.
Regulatory posture
MyFundedFutures LLC is a US limited liability company founded in 2023 by chief executive Matthew Leech, operating from Dallas, Texas, with registration recorded in Delaware. It holds no CFTC registration, no NFA membership, and no brokerage licence. It is not a regulated futures commission merchant and does not claim to be.
Leech is publicly visible on X and Discord, which is worth noting because opacity at the top is a live risk factor in this sector — but personal visibility is not a regulatory safeguard. Accounts are simulated and evaluation fees are non-refundable. A trader in a termination dispute has recourse to the firm’s own compliance process and to civil claim, and to nothing else. That gap is the subject of our coverage of ESMA’s CFD conflicts sweep, which leaves prop trading untouched.
FAQ
Does MyFundedFutures actually pay?
The published record says yes, emphatically: $123m across 55,733 payouts, $74m in the trailing 90 days, processed through Riseworks. That figure is self-reported and unaudited, but a 4.9/5 Trustpilot rating across 17,498 reviews is hard to fabricate at that volume. Payout speed is not the risk with this firm.
Why do traders report being banned after requesting a payout?
Reported terminations cite “multiple profiles” or “coordinated trading” following a compliance call, with the firm declining to publish the evidence relied on. We could not verify individual cases. The substantive finding is that no published evidentiary standard exists, so a trader cannot know in advance what conduct triggers a review.
Which plan has the best rules?
It depends on your drawdown tolerance. Core and Pro run a 3% end-of-day trail, which is the most forgiving structure because it advances only on closing balance. Rapid pays the best split at 90/10 but runs a 4% intraday trail that ratchets on unrealised highs. Do not choose Rapid for the split alone.
Is there really no daily loss limit?
Correct — none of the five current plans carries one. A single poor session cannot end your account provided you remain above the overall drawdown line. This is the firm’s most significant structural advantage and is more consequential than its profit split.
Is MyFundedFutures regulated?
No. MyFundedFutures LLC is a US-registered company with no CFTC registration, no NFA membership and no brokerage licence. Trading is simulated, evaluation fees are non-refundable, and a trader in dispute has no ombudsman or compensation scheme to appeal to.
This review is independent editorial analysis and is not financial, investment, or trading advice, and is not an endorsement or solicitation. The Industry Spread has no affiliate or referral relationship with the firms covered. Proprietary trading challenges carry a fee that is generally non-refundable, most participants do not reach a funded account, and funded capital is the firm’s capital, not the trader’s. Terms change frequently — always verify current rules directly with the firm before paying any fee.