Solana Funded review: 90% on the page, 80% in the docs
Solana Funded's homepage promises a 90% split and withdrawals on demand. Its docs set a standard 80% split and a 21-day wait before the first payout.

Prop-firm review
Solana Funded
Verdict Solana Funded suits meme-coin traders who can accept a simulated book, a 30% consistency check before any withdrawal, and a rulebook that times the first payout at 21 days. It does not suit anyone who treats the homepage lines of a 90% split and withdrawals on demand as the contract. The biggest caveat is the payout record: on 21 October 2026 the site's own module showed $0 paid out on-chain, and the firm publishes no audited total.
- Reviewed
- 21 Oct 2026
- Operating entity
- SolaraX Markets FZCO
- Platform
- Solana Tap
- Website
- solanafunded.com
The Industry Spread reviews prop firms independently. Firms do not pay for reviews and cannot see them before publication. The Industry Spread has no affiliate or referral relationship with the firms covered.
Verdict: Solana Funded suits meme-coin traders who can accept a simulated book, a 30% consistency check before any withdrawal, and a rulebook that times the first payout at 21 days. It does not suit anyone who treats the homepage lines of a 90% split and withdrawals on demand as the contract. The biggest caveat is the payout record: on 21 October 2026 the site's own module showed $0 paid out on-chain, and the firm publishes no audited total.
Key terms
- 1-Step list fee: $88 on $2,500 and $1,138 on $100,000, in the pricing script on the how-it-works page. A 2-Step $2,500 account is $76. LaunchPad is $5 up front.
- Account sizes: $2,500 to $100,000 on meme challenges. Prediction-market sizes in that script run from $10,000 to $150,000.
- Profit split: 80% standard, up to 90% only with an add-on, on the profit-split page. The homepage FAQ states a flat 90%.
- 1-Step profit target: 45% in phase one, none once funded, on the challenge comparison. 1-Step Elite is 50%. 2-Step is 30% then 20%.
- Maximum drawdown: 25% standard, 20% Elite, from the starting balance, on the maximum-drawdown page.
- Daily loss: 10% of the initial balance, reset at 00:00 UTC, on the daily-drawdown page.
- First payout at 21 days, then every 14 days, on the payout-cycles page. A weekly add-on shortens both clocks to 7 days.
- Minimum trading days: 5, including the funded phase of a standard 1-Step, on the challenge comparison above.
What Solana Funded publishes about payouts
The profit-split document pays 80% by default and up to 90% with an add-on. Its example refunds a $2,398 fee, a sum that matches no list price from $76 to $1,438. On 21 October 2026 the homepage FAQ instead promised a flat 90% and withdrawals on demand. The how-it-works page says "keep 90% of everything you earn". LaunchPad says "up to 90%" and payment within 24 hours of approval, then a first cycle at 21 days and every 14 days after.
The cycle page is the clock: 21 days, then 14, or 7 and 7 with the weekly add-on. The account must be in profit. "Instant", "within 24 hours" and "on demand" are three different promises.
Consistency blocks the withdrawal, not the account. The consistency page caps any single day at 30% of total profit, and only when a payout is requested. The page still prints "[PLACEHOLDER IMAGE — Consistency Rule Chart]". Approved rewards are USDC or SOL to a saved wallet. KYC starts after $100,000 USDC of withdrawals, via Veriff. Funded capital caps at $400,000, with further passes on standby, per the allocation page. The refund policy of 14 January 2026 returns the fee only with the third successful payout.
The payout total is what we could not verify. "Recent payouts" showed "$0 paid out on-chain", beside "Ethan Zhang $18,990 on 100K account" and the stub "Rg9...kl23". That stub is not a full signature. About-page claims of "$4.2M+", "12K+" users and "99.9%" reliability do not match a homepage badge of "50,000+ traders", and none is audited. No named trader posted a dated withdrawal with a full on-chain id that we could check. Testimonial cards still include Latin filler, so those names were not used. A social sweep was skipped.
Rules that can void the account
The terms, updated 16 March 2026, call the evaluation simulated and the funded account virtual. Article 4 says no real trade is executed, balances have no value off the platform, and a pass creates no right to actual capital. A SOL or USDC reward, if sent, is a separate payment. Our explainer of what a funded account is is the frame: the capital is the firm's, not the trader's.
Article 7 does the damage. No position may exceed 2.5% of a token's market capitalisation or 10% of its 24-hour volume. Tokens already down 85% in a day are banned, as are unapproved bots, copy-trading, signal services, trading on a non-public listing, and pushing a price through a following. A token the trader, a friend, or a group launched is banned, and so is a token whose liquidity they control. The firm's view of "gambling" is final. Tick-level scalping of the feed is banned. Contracts must end in "pump". The homepage FAQ still says "no restrictions" on Pump.fun, Raydium and Jupiter. Standard accounts allow five open positions. Elite removes that cap, raises the phase-one target to 50% or, on 2-Step Elite, 35% then 25%, and cuts maximum drawdown to 20%. A second account on the same IP, device, card or address needs written permission.
Where the rule pages disagree
Drawdown is three rules. Article 1.4 measures it from the highest value, which reads as trailing. The maximum-drawdown page makes it static: an Elite $100,000 account keeps an $80,000 floor even at a $110,000 balance. The daily page sets 10% of the initial balance from the 00:00 UTC close and breaches in real time. LaunchPad rules, and the homepage tooltip, instead use the previous day's highest balance or equity and ignore an intraday swing if the close is inside the line.
LaunchPad's target is also split. The LaunchPad rules say 45% of starting balance, $1,125 on $2,500 and $45,000 on $100,000, with no minimum days in phase one and five once funded. The homepage pricing script sets that target at 15%, and marks the $5 entry as outside the site discount. The fee table matches the script on money: $5 now, then $94 to $1,270 only after a pass. The $5 is not refundable. A buyer does not know which target the dashboard will enforce.
Prediction markets in that script show a 6% target, 3% maximum drawdown, 2% daily loss and a 35% consistency rule. Fees run from $79 to $599. The block states no split. A banner was advertising 30% off meme challenges. No code is repeated here.
How the numbers compare with FTMO and FundedNext
These are not the same market. Solana Funded simulates Solana tokens. FTMO describes a demo CFD account. FundedNext names GrowthNext F.Z.E. in Ajman and says its programmes are simulated, as printed on 21 October 2026. See the payout-checked comparisons.
| Published figure | Solana Funded 1-Step | FTMO Challenge 2-Step | FundedNext CFDs-FNL:002 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trader share | 80% | Up to 90% | 85% |
| Maximum loss | 25% | 10% | 12% |
| Minimum days | 5 | 4 | 2 |
The 80% is the docs figure, not the homepage 90%. FTMO's objectives page sets the 2-Step target at 10% then 5%, daily loss at 5%, maximum loss at 10%, and a minimum of four days with a trade opened. "Up to 90%" is the firm-wide line on the challenge explainer. FundedNext's CFDs-FNL:002 card states 85%, a 12% loss limit, two profitable days and a reward in three days. It states no profit target, so none is invented. Solana Funded's first withdrawal remains 21 days.
Regulatory posture
The footer names SolaraX Markets FZCO, Building A1, Dubai Business Park, Dubai, trading as Solana Funded. The terms' notice clause instead says Dubai Digital Park. We found no licence number, DFSA permission or SCA permission. The firm says it is not a broker and does not take deposits. UAE law governs, with arbitration in Dubai after 30 days of negotiation. The privacy policy cites Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 and the GDPR for EU residents. Article 3 bars under-18s and unnamed "prohibited jurisdictions". Co-founders Rem and Kyza appear by handle only, which is not a quote. The Telegram bot is marked "coming soon". Evaluations are priced, so the book is not closed.
The footer cites CFTC Rule 4.41. The statement in 17 CFR 4.41, as carried by Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute, is:
These results are based on simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading.
That is not a CFTC registration. Quoting a US rule does not create a permission, which is the point of our note on firms that sold a UK authorisation they did not have. Solana Funded is not one of those firms. It is a Dubai simulated-trading brand, the fact the prop firms desk starts from.
Frequently asked questions
Is the funded account live capital?
No. Articles 4.1 to 4.3 say the platform is simulated, no real trade is executed, balances are virtual, and a pass creates no right to capital. Payout pages still describe SOL or USDC if a request is approved. Treat the book as a simulation and any reward as a separate payment. The dashboard figure is not money the trader already owns.
Is the split 90% or 80%?
The homepage FAQ and the how-it-works page say 90%. The profit-split document says 80%, or up to 90% with an enhanced add-on. LaunchPad's rewards note says "up to 90%", which is the add-on ceiling, not a flat 90. Until one line is removed, the table in the docs is the safer reading and the homepage sentence is the sales line.
When can the first payout be requested?
The cycles page says 21 days after funded trading begins, then every 14 days. The weekly add-on makes both intervals 7 days. The account must be in profit and inside the 30% consistency rule. "On demand" is not on that page. "Within 24 hours" on LaunchPad describes speed after a valid request, not a right to ask on day one.
Does Solana Funded require KYC?
Not at the start, on the homepage FAQ and the LaunchPad rewards note. Both waive identity checks for trading and for withdrawal requests until total withdrawals exceed $100,000 USDC. The firm then names Veriff. The terms still allow a document request for anti-money-laundering checks, and they allow the firm to close an account opened on false details without a refund.
Are challenge fees refundable?
The refund policy says no, apart from one incentive. After a third successful payout, if the account is in good standing and no rule was broken, the original fee can come back, usually with that payout. A fault caused by the firm, or an exceptional case, may be reviewed. Neither is promised. The terms treat the fee as spent once access opens or any order is placed, changed, or cancelled.
This review is independent editorial analysis and is not financial, investment, or trading advice, and is not an endorsement or solicitation. The Industry Spread has no affiliate or referral relationship with the firms covered. Proprietary trading challenges carry a fee that is generally non-refundable, most participants do not reach a funded account, and funded capital is the firm's capital, not the trader's. Terms change frequently — always verify current rules directly with the firm before paying any fee.
Reporting by Abdelaziz Fathi. Filed 21 October 2026, 11:02 GMT.



