Verdict. Forexive suits a trader who wants the cheapest entry into a simulated FX evaluation — $10 on the Access route — and who reads the help centre rather than the homepage. It does not suit anyone who takes the marketing at face value: the advertised 95% split is a post-scaling number, the 24-hour payout is a paid add-on, and the binding terms disclaim the funded programme entirely. The biggest caveat is that the firm’s “Our Story” page describes a company founded in Prague in 2015, while the entity behind it was incorporated in London in 2024.

Key terms at a glance

• Entry fees: $10 for 1-Step Access, $5 for 2-Step, balance due on passing, per the Access explainer (accessed 8 September 2026). Standard prices start at $29, $39 and $15.
• Account sizes: $5,000–$200,000 on 1-Step and 2-Step, $1,000–$10,000 on Instant, per forexive.com, which advertises both “up to $2M SIMULATED CAPITAL” and “Up to $400K”.
• Profit split: 80% on the first payout, 85% from the second, 95% only “After Scale up”, per the 1-Step profit split article. Instant pays 70% then 80%.
• Profit targets: 10% on 1-Step; 8% then 4% on 2-Step, untimed, per the 2-Step target page.
• Maximum drawdown: static — 6% on 1-Step, 12% on 2-Step, 3% on Instant, per the 2-Step drawdown article.
• Daily loss limit and minimum days: 3% daily on 1-Step, 5% on 2-Step; three trading days per phase, or seven profitable days of 0.5% or more on Instant.
• Payout cadence: first payment “after four weeks and every two weeks (14 Days) after”, on “the second and last Tuesday of every month”.

What the register says Forexive is

A query against Companies House on 8 September 2026 returns FOREXIVE LTD as active, incorporated 28 May 2024, registered at 3rd Floor, 86-90 Paul Street, London EC2A 4NE — the address in Forexive’s own footer. Its sole director is Hooman Abbasi, appointed on incorporation.

Two entries matter more than the address. The nature of business is SIC 85590, “Other education not elsewhere classified”, not a financial code. And the company was incorporated as HF GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD, becoming FOREXIVE LTD only on 10 December 2024. A prop desk registered as a school is not unusual: the same mismatch appears in our Axia Investing review, and the reason it recurs is set out in our analysis of where the prop trading perimeter actually bites.

The founding story on the About page is not Forexive’s

Forexive’s About Us page carries a block headed “Our Story”. Retrieved on 8 September 2026, it reads: “n 2015, Marek Vašíček and Otakar Šuffner were recent university graduates with a clear vision–to make a living through trading… What started in a small Prague office has since grown into a global technology company… Marek Vašíček (CTO) leads technological development and is the mind behind the in-house systems and tools used at APEX CAPITAL.” The entity behind the page is 15 months old.

That narrative belongs to FTMO, a Prague-headquartered prop firm, whose about page states that “FTMO has evolved from a bold student vision of founders Otakar Šuffner and Marek Vašíček” and dates the business to 2015. FTMO is a third party with no connection to Forexive, has made no public statement on the text, and The Industry Spread makes no allegation about how the passage came to appear. Only the observable is reportable: the passages are materially identical, the Forexive version opens with a truncated “n 2015”, the substituted brand — “APEX CAPITAL” — is neither firm, and the page’s own timeline block reads “Since 2024”.

The substitution recurs in the general terms and conditions. Counting occurrences in the HTML retrieved on 8 September 2026, the run-together token “FOREXIVEChallenge” appears 37 times and “FOREXIVETrader” 11 times, plus single instances of “FOREXIVECHALLENGE”, “FOREXIVEChallenges”, “FOREXIVETRADER” and “FOREXIVEENTITIES” — the signature of a brand string swapped in where the original name was followed by a space. Clause 2.2 offers “the Free Monthly Trading Contrast”, then calls it “the Free Trial” a sentence later.

What the terms actually commit Forexive to

The homepage sells “Profit Split 95%”, “Payouts Within 24H”, “On-Demand Payout” and “24 Hours Guaranteed Reward”. None of those strings appears in the GTC: searching the retrieved terms for “95%”, “24h”, “payout”, “profit split” and “static” returns zero matches for each.

What clause 7 says is this: “If the Customer is successful in both the Challenge and Verification, the Customer may be offered a contract by a third-party company, in its sole discretion… FOREXIVE LTD is in no way involved with the FOREXIVETrader Program agreement—or lack thereof—executed between the third-party company and the Customer.” Clause 6.7 adds that a recommendation “in no way guarantees Customer’s acceptance”. The company selling the evaluation disclaims the funded stage it exists to reach, and never names the third party that would provide it.

Two gaps compound that. The GTC carry no governing-law or jurisdiction clause — searching for “governing law”, “shall be governed” and “exclusive jurisdiction” returns nothing — leaving a consumer in dispute with a London company without a stated forum. And clause 2.6 states that “The Customer is not entitled to a refund of the fee”, while the refundable fee article promises it back with the first payout plus a 20% bonus, “making it a total of 120% of the challenge fee”. The Access page puts that refund at the third payout.

Payouts: what is published, and what cannot be verified

Forexive publishes no audited payout data, no ledger and no aggregate figure for sums paid to traders. The homepage counters that would carry those numbers are injected client-side with target values of 15, 20 and 180 — traders, capital funded in millions, countries — while copy two screens above claims traders “from over 195 countries”. Neither figure is sourced.

The 24-hour claim resolves into an add-on. The On-Demand Reward article states it “costs an additional 10% of the original challenge price”, applies “only to your first eligible reward request”, and works only after KYC, funded status and a “standard account and trading review”. The 95% split has the same shape: reached after scaling, or bought as the Lifetime 100% Reward add-on at “an additional 25% of the original challenge price”. The documented default is 80% on payout one, four weeks after funding, on a fixed twice-monthly Tuesday calendar.

Independent verification is where this review stops. Forexive’s Trustpilot profile carries no score. In its place Trustpilot displays: “This company’s rating is unavailable due to a breach of our guidelines.” The page also states the platform has “removed a number of fake reviews for this company”. The profile is unclaimed, shows 97 reviews and splits 60% five-star against 29% one-star, with entries as recent as 7 September 2026. Among the one-star reviews, a user posting as “Warraich movie music” wrote on 28 August 2026: “I bought an access account, amount have been deducted from my account but I haven’t got the credentials yet.” That is an unverified claim, and Trustpilot’s notice means neither side of the ledger is evidence. Forexive’s payout record is unverified in both directions.

The rules that fail traders

Several documented mechanics conflict. The 2-Step payout article works an example around “the 5% daily drawdown limit” while the 1-Step daily limit is 3% — the same worked example reused with the wrong figure attached.

Instant funding carries the sharpest trap. Its maximum drawdown is stated as 3% of the initial balance, but the maximum loss per trade rule says that on a $50,000 account “your equity must never fall below $49,500”, and the account breaches the moment equity touches that level, “regardless of whether the positions later return to profit”. That is a 1% equity floor described as a per-trade rule, and it binds long before the 3% does. Instant also demands seven profitable days of 0.5% or more, a 20% single-day consistency cap and 3% total profit before any payout request — on an account capped at $10,000.

Progression is manual: a passing trader is told to email support and wait for credentials. Payment is card or cryptocurrency only. Platform support is contradictory — the homepage carousel lists “Match-Trade Coming Soon”, “Ctrader Coming Soon” and “Platform 5”; the help centre answers “MetaTrader 5”. The footer’s Pricing link returned HTTP 404 on 8 September 2026.

Who actually operates the site

Forexive declares its favicons from a third party’s WordPress: all three link rel="icon" tags on the homepage, About page and terms page point at apextradercapital.com/wp-content/uploads/. That domain markets itself as “The Complete Operating System for Prop Firms” — dashboards, risk automation, KYC and payout processing sold to operators. Both files returned HTTP 404 on 8 September 2026, but the references remain in the served markup and purchase links carry a type=apex parameter. On this evidence Forexive is a white-label on vendor infrastructure, the shape documented in our PropAccount review. For accuracy: apextradercapital.com is not Apex Trader Funding, the US futures firm, which is not involved. The vendor’s about page contains none of the Vašíček, Šuffner or Prague text, so the story is Forexive’s own content.

How Forexive compares

Measure	Forexive	FTUK	Axia Investing
Entity	England, 2024, education SIC	UK, 2021, not FCA authorised	Brazil, 2017, education code
Cheapest entry	$10, balance after passing	$235, pay after pass	R$350, 30-day plan
Headline split	95% advertised, 80% documented	up to 80%	85% top tier, 50% on two tiers
Max account	$200,000 ($10,000 Instant)	$150,000, scaling to $6.4m	Contract-count tiers
Payout cadence	Four weeks, then fortnightly	Instant to bi-weekly	Monthly, by the 10th
Drawdown	Static 6% / 12% / 3%	5–8% trailing or static	Static cumulative

Competitor figures as verified in our FTUK review (4 August 2026) and Axia Investing review (2 September 2026).

Regulatory posture

Forexive is not regulated and does not claim to be. The GTC state at clause 1.6 that “none of the services provided to you by the provider can be considered investment services”, and at clause 1.5 that all trading is simulated and that “the funds provided to you for demo trading are fictitious”. The site disclaimer adds that “FOREXIVE companies do not act as a broker and do not accept any deposits”. Everything up to and including the funded stage is a simulation; the only real money moving is the fee. Note also the homepage contact number, +420 910 920 310, which carries the Czech Republic country code while the registered entity is English. The gap between a young company and an older claimed record recurs across the category, as in our FundedX review.

FAQ

Does Forexive really pay a 95% profit split? Not by default. Its own help centre sets the split at 80% on the first payout and 85% from the second, with 95% reached only after scaling. A 100% split is sold as an add-on at an extra 25% of the challenge price. The figure appears nowhere in the binding terms.

Are payouts really processed within 24 hours? The figure appears in one place: the On-Demand Reward add-on, at an extra 10% of the challenge price, applying only to a trader’s first eligible reward and only after KYC, funded status and an account review. The documented standard is a first payment four weeks after funding, then fortnightly on fixed Tuesdays.

Is Forexive regulated in the United Kingdom? No. FOREXIVE LTD is registered at Companies House under an education SIC code. Company registration is not financial regulation: it confers no oversight of client money and gives a trader no route to the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

Why does the Trustpilot page show no score? Trustpilot has suppressed it, displaying “This company’s rating is unavailable due to a breach of our guidelines” in place of a TrustScore and stating that it removed a number of fake reviews for the company. The 97 reviews remain visible; the score does not.

This review is independent editorial analysis and is not financial, investment, or trading advice, and is not an endorsement or solicitation. The Industry Spread has no affiliate or referral relationship with the firms covered. Proprietary trading challenges carry a fee that is generally non-refundable, most participants do not reach a funded account, and funded capital is the firm’s capital, not the trader’s. Terms change frequently — always verify current rules directly with the firm before paying any fee.