BNY Mellon

Compliance Constraints Led to More Trade Finance Rejection Rates, Says Report

BNY Mellon report found that the trade finance gap remains a significant issue for global trade, affecting development and investment flows and financial inclusion.

The report, “Overcoming the Trade Finance Gap: Root Causes and Remedies”, was conducted between April 2018 and January 2019 with 100 global, regional, and domestic banks, specialist trade providers and other market participants responding to its survey.

The research study found that trade finance rejection rates accelerated in more than one-third or (33%) of institutions surveyed in the past year, with nearly three-quarters or (71%) of respondents citing compliance constraints and the inability for applicants to provide quality know your customer (KYC) as a key factor influencing the volume of rejection rates. This has led to banks being more selective and moving away from geographies and sectors that appear to hold greater risk for less reward.
Joon Kim, Head of Global Trade Product and Portfolio Management, BNY Mellon Treasury Services
Joon Kim

Joon Kim, Head of Global Trade Product and Portfolio Management, BNY Mellon Treasury Services, said: “Our survey has shown that a significant proportion of institutions are increasingly unable to provide trade finance due to heightened regulatory requirements as well as several other trends. This could have serious implications such as potentially widening the trade finance gap, compounding the lack of access to finance already being experienced by many businesses in emerging markets, and impacting the strength of global trade.”

Paul Camp, Chief Executive Officer, BNY Mellon Treasury Services
Paul Camp

Paul Camp, Chief Executive Officer, BNY Mellon Treasury Services, added:”Addressing the trade finance gap is a priority for the industry, and it is important that we work together to find the solutions that will be most effective in achieving this. There are efforts underway, but more work is required to ensure significant progress is made. We hope our survey will serve as a catalyst for driving further industry discussion and help to identify the areas of focus that will allow us to make tangible steps towards improving financial inclusion – and closing the gap.”

Technology and regulatory revision are seen as two potential approaches that could help to narrow the trade finance gap. Nearly two-thirds of respondents said centralized KYC databases could provide a technology-based solution and more than half said regulatory revision would most benefit from greater collaboration between banks and regulators. Risk sharing partnerships with correspondent banks is seen as the most effective way of encouraging additional financing capability.
There is a gap in global trade finance in the range of USD$1.6 trillion annually on untapped potential in trade, unrealized economic value and lost opportunity, according to the Asian Development Bank.
In late 2018, Thomson Reuters partnered with specialist firm Seabury TFX to develop a new marketplace for trade finance in Asia with the aim of narrowing the $1.6 billion trillion gap.