Should the largest Bitcoin trade be priced in BTC or USD?

Three days ago, the Bitcoin network witnessed a staggering transaction of 26,139 BTC, valued at $1.347 billion. This recent transaction contrasts sharply with a notable event from 2011, where 500,000 BTC were moved, then valued at around $1.13 million.

Three days ago, the Bitcoin network witnessed a staggering transaction of 26,139 BTC, valued at $1.347 billion. This monumental transaction has reignited discussions within the cryptocurrency community and beyond about the largest trades in Bitcoin’s history.

Traditionally, the magnitude of a Bitcoin transaction could be assessed in two ways: the volume of Bitcoin transferred or its equivalent value in fiat currency at the time of the transaction.

500,000 BTC worth $1 million vs 26,000 BTC worth $1.3 billion

The 26,139 BTC trade worth $1.347 billion contrasts sharply with a notable event from 2011, where 500,000 BTC were moved, then valued at around $1.13 million. While the 2011 transaction boasts a higher volume of Bitcoin, the recent transfer’s fiat valuation far exceeds that of any previous transaction.

This leads to a broader question: Should Bitcoin continue to be valued in USD, or are we witnessing a turning point in the history of currency?

The debate is fueled further by influential figures like Edward Snowden, who recently proclaimed Bitcoin to be the “most significant monetary advance since the creation of coinage.” It is also widely known that El Salvador made Bitcoin legal tender. Such endorsements bring significant attention to Bitcoin’s potential role in the future of financial systems.

Commodities are priced in currency

Despite the excitement and speculative future uses of Bitcoin, the conclusion drawn from current trends and economic practices is clear: we are not at a turning point towards abandoning traditional fiat currencies in favor of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.

The world continues to operate predominantly with fiat currencies such as the USD, EUR, JPY, CHF, and GBP. Bitcoin has indeed carved out a niche for itself, often likened to “digital gold”. However, at this juncture, Bitcoin is not a currency in the conventional sense. Instead, it is widely treated as a commodity by regulators, investors, and miners. Commodities are priced in currencies.

The discussion surrounding the largest Bitcoin transaction and the valuation of Bitcoin in USD underscores the evolving nature of money and investment in the digital age. Yet, despite the significant milestones and the disruptive potential of cryptocurrencies, the global financial ecosystem remains firmly anchored in the use of fiat currencies. The journey of Bitcoin and other digital currencies is far from over, but their role as mainstream currency substitutes remains speculative, at least for now.



  • Financefeeds.com